ISU Algebra Seminar 2007-2008
Participants
Fusun Akman, Lucian Ionescu,
George Seelinger, Gaywalee Yamskulna, Wenhua Zhao
Fall 2007 - Thursdays
@10:00
a.m. WIH 22A
9/6: L. Ionescu - On Rota-Baxter algebras I (after hep-th/0407082)
9/13: skipped;
9/20: L. Ionescu: - On RBA II: Spitzer's identity
9/27: no seminar
10/11 F. Akman: Beyond Hopf algebras I (after Loday's talk, Paris,
spring 2007)
10/18 F. Akman: Beyond Hopf algebras II (dendriform algebras and
Dynkin's theorem)
10/25 L. Ionescu: On RBAIII: Splitting
a RB-algebra (A possibly new result)
11/1 R. Dijkgraff, The Quantum Geometry of Strings (MSRI
Video)
11/8 L. Ionescu: On RBA IV: Splitting
an RB-algebra (after hep-th/0407082 - the
\chi map)
11/15 cancelled
11/22 Thanksgiving break - no seminar
11/29 Tim D. Comar REGULAR CONFORMATIONS
AND REGULAR STICK NUMBERS OF KNOTS AND LINKS
12/6 W. Zhao - A Vanishing Conjecture on Differential Operators with
Constant Coefficients
12/13 Final's week - no seminar.
Winter break
Spring 2008 - Thursday @
1:00 p.m. Room: WIH 111
1/24 G. Yamskulna - Classification of irreducible modules of a vertex
algebra $V_L^+$
when $L$ is a non-degenerate even lattice of an arbitrary rank.
1/31 L. Ionescu - On Rota-Baxter algebras and Lie
group decompositions.
2/7 External Speaker - MSRI Video:
Yair
Minsky, Introductory
topics in Kleinian groups and hyperbolic 3-manifolds Start
Video
2/14 Invited speaker (ISU Kepler Speakers Series),. Ray Kurzwel, The
acceleration of technology in the 21st century.
2/21 Fusun Akman, What
the Hecke is a Differential
Operator?
Differential operators of higher
orders that act on commutative associative
algebras (such as the algebras of polynomials or smooth functions) have
been
defined by Grothendieck. Even if we didn’t know the definition, we
would
be inclined to say “I know one when I see one.” Generalizations to
noncommutative and even nonassociative algebras, as well as modules,
have been made,
but not in a universal way. We will talk about the three older
definitions (Grothendieck,
Koszul, Akman) that coincide for a commutative associative algebra
(proof by
Akman and Ionescu), and compare them with Ginzburg and Schedler’s
definition for associative algebras (“Differential Operators and BV
Structures in Noncommutative Geometry”, math.QA/0710.3392). For
starters,
twisted commutative algebras (e.g. free tensor algebras) and their
differential
operators will be defined. Then (oh, joy!) differential operators on
commutative “wheelgebras” will be considered. Thus, the differential
operators of noncommutative geometry will act not on a general
associative
algebra A, but on
a “Fock
space” F(A) which
is
defined functorially (and happens to be a commutative wheelgebra).
2/28 Jinjia Li,
“Intersection
multiplicity and Serre’s multiplicity conjecture”, in
Room 128 Williams Hall.
3/4 Iana Anguelova, Centre de Recherches Mathematique, "Vertex
algebras: from super to quantum", Room Williams Hall 128.
3/6 Sunil K. Chebolu, University of Western Ontario, "The unreasonable
effectiveness of homotopy theory in algebra and representation theory".
Spring break
3/20 Fusun: What the Hecke is a Differential Operator II.
3/24 Dr. Pisheng Ding, from St. John's University in New York, Shape
Distortion (Room: WIH 112, at 12:00 pm)
Abstract: There are numerous examples of analytic or meromorphic
functions which map some lines or rays into other lines or rays. On
the other hand, except for linear polynomials, no functions analytic on
a triangle can map all three of its sides into three other lines.
This is one of the lemmas that we establish to show that linear
polynomials are the only analytic functions which ever map some
polygon onto another polygon. Thus, unless it is a linear polynomial, a
function analytic on a closed polygon never preserves its shape,
despite the fact that every analytic function is locally conformal, or
shape-preserving, at all noncritical points. Looking at it another
way, there is no analytic mapping between any two dissimilar polygons,
despite the fact that the Riemann Mapping Theorem guarantees the
existence of many conformal equivalences between the interiors of any
two polygons. The proof rests on some special arguments for the
rectangle case and the triangle case, and proceeds somewhat
unexpectedly by induction on the number of sides of the polygon.
3/27 W. Zhao, Noncommutative
Symmetric
Systems over Associative Algebras I.
4/3 W. Zhao, Noncommutative
Symmetric
Systems over Associative Algebras II.
4/10 L. Ionescu,
1) On NC-Symmetric systems and Rota-Baxter algebras;
2) From Lie Theory to Deformation Theory, Part I Lie
Groups after Graeme Segal, Lectures on Lie Groups
4/19 CVE
Conference Talk, College of Business Rm 353, 4:25-4:45 p.m.
L. Ionescu: What is a space-time coordinate system
on a graph?
4/24 This week's seminar has been moved to Friday:
4/25 Friday at 3:00 p.m., WIH 308, Visitor presentation:
Speaker: Gene Freudenberg from Western Michigan University,
Title: Locally Nilpotent Derivations in
Affine Algebraic Geometry
Abstract. We first review the role of
locally nilpotent derivations in
some of the central questions of affine algebraic geometry: the
Abyhankar-Sathaye Embedding Conjecture, the Affine Cancellation
Problem, and
the Dolgachev-Weisfeiler Conjecture. We then turn attention to the
fascinating
examples of Bhatwadekar-Dutta (1992) and Vénéreau (2000),
where these questions
remain open. In particular, there are polynomials f in C [x,y,z,u]
such that B
is a C^2-fibration over the subring A=C [x,f]. This condition implies
B/fB is a
polynomial ring, meaning that f defines a hyperplane in C^4. However,
it is not
known if B=A[P,Q] for P,Q in B (Dolgachev-Weisfeiler Conjecture), or
even if f
is a variable of B (Abhyankar-Sathaye Conjecture). In 2004, the author
showed
that f is stably an A variable, specifically, B[t]=A[X,Y,Z] for an
indeterminate t over B. Therefore, the locally nilpotent A-derivation
d/dt on
B[t] has slice t and kernel B. This leads to the following beautiful
question:
If R is a commutative affine domain over C, and theta is a locally
nilpotent R-derivation
of R[X,Y,Z] with a slice, do there exist P,Q in R[X,Y,Z] such that the
kernel
of theta equals R[P,Q]? We explore this question, with particular
attention to
the case R=\C [a,b], a polynomial ring in two variables.
5/1 L. Ionescu, Part I (cont) The building blocks of Lie groups: SU2,
SO3, SL2(R)
Summer break.
For previous semesters see
my ISU web page