COURSE SYLLABUS for PSY 340
| |||||||||
InstructorDr. Matthew Hesson-McInnis
|
Office HoursWednesdays 2:00pm to 4:00pmor by appointment | ||||||||
Course Web Page |
Mallard Web Page
| ||||||||
Prerequisite: PSY/ECO/GEO/POS 138 (not for credit if had PSY 240 or PSY 345)
3 Semester HoursAdvanced statistical techniques for the behavioral sciences including hypothesis testing, inferential statistics, and data analysis using SPSS.
This course is designed to cover hypothesis testing in the behavioral sciences, building on concepts learned in PSY/ECO/GEO/POS 138. The logic, assumptions, computation, and interpretation of inferential statistics will be covered, including correlation and bivariate regression; one-sample, paired-samples, and independent-samples t-tests; and one-way and two-way ANOVA. In addition to the logic of hypothesis testing, PSY 340 will integrate the use of the software package SPSS as a tool for data management and hypothesis testing. Writing skills will also be developed through a research report and open-ended exam questions.
Students who have met the course prerequisitive other than through PSY/ECO/GEO/POS 138 are strongly encouraged to meet with the instructor to develop a plan to address deficiencies in skills typically gained during this prerequisite course. Students who took the 138 course are, of course, also welcome to meet with the instructor to develop a plan to brush up on their skills if they so desire. One component of such a plan are self-paced tutorial sessions on using SPSS. This lab (DEG 13) will be available, as will a teaching assistant, on most Friday afternoons throughout the semester. Specific schedules will be posted.
Any student needing to arrange a reasonable accommodation for a
documented disability should contact Disability Concerns at 350 Fell Hall,
438-5853 (voice), 438-8620 (TDD). Students who ask the instructor for
special accommodations based on disabilities must work with Disability
Concerns to assess and document their needs.
score = 0.40*(exam average) + 0.30*(homework average) + 0.20*(project) + 0.10*(quiz average)
The total score will be computed and available within the Mallard web page for each student throughout the semester. Scores at or above 90.00% will earn an "A"; scores below 90.00% but at or above 80.00% will earn a "B"; scores below 80.00% but at or above 70.00% will earn a "C"; scores below 70.00% but at or above 60.00% will earn a "D"; and scores below 60.00% will earn an "F". It is important to note that Mallard computes the total course score with floating-point precision, although only two decimal places are displayed. Thus, the only rounding that will occur will be in the third decimal place. For example, an 89.995 would be rounded to 90.00 for the course score, earning an A for the course grade. A score of 89.994, however, would round to 89.99 for the course score, earning a B for the course grade.
Students who wish to improve their grades may complete a broader version of the course project (essentially writing a full, APA style empirical research paper rather than just the Results and Discussion sections as assigned). Further details will be available on the project web page. Each student who completes this larger project will have the project grade replace any two homework assignment grades.
Additionally, students may participate in one hour of research conducted within the department and write a one-page summary of their experiences participating (turned in with the blue cards) to void the late penalty on any one quiz or homework assignment.
It is also important to note that course letter grades are not
negotiable under any circumstances. Grades are earned by the
student rather than given by the instructor. Course letter grades
are determined by the formula and criteria stated above. Please do not ask
the instructor to assign a better grade for the course, to offer individual
extra credit opportunities, or to make exceptions to these grading
policies.
| Date | Topic (linked to lecture notes) | Readings (linked to textbook extras) |
| 1/13 - 1/15 | Introduction to the course, SPSS, Mallard, and research methods | N/A |
| 1/20 - 1/22 | Review of central tendency, variability, and z-scores | Aron & Aron, Ch. 2 |
| 1/27 - 1/29 | Review of correlation | Aron & Aron, Ch. 3 |
| 2/3 - 2/5 | Review of regression and prediction | Aron & Aron, Ch. 4 |
| 2/10 - 2/17 | The normal distribution and hypothesis testing | Aron & Aron, Ch. 5 & Ch. 6 |
| 2/19 | Exam 1 | Aron & Aron, Ch. 2 - 6 |
| 2/24 | Sampling Distributions | Aron & Aron, Ch. 7 |
| 2/26 - 3/2 | Effect sizes and power | Aron & Aron, Ch. 8 |
| 3/4 - 3/16 | One-sample and paired-sample t-tests | Aron & Aron, Ch. 9 |
| 3/18 - 3/23 | Independent samples t-tests | Aron & Aron, Ch. 10 |
| 3/25 | Hypothesis testing for correlation and regression | *** |
| 3/30 | Exam 2 | Aron & Aron, Ch. 2 - 10 |
| 4/1 - 4/6 | Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) Basic concepts | Aron & Aron, Ch. 11 |
| 4/8 - 4/13 | One-way ANOVA: Computation | Aron & Aron, Ch. 12 |
| 4/15 - 4/22 | Two-way ANOVA: Basic concepts | Aron & Aron, Ch. 13 |
| 4/27 - 4/29 | Additional Topics and the General Linear Model | Aron & Aron, Ch. 16 |
| 5/6 | Final Exam (i.e., Exam 3) Thursday at 10:00am - 12:00pm | Aron & Aron, Ch. 2 - 13 & 16 |
Students are expected to live up to Illinois State University's standards for academic integrity. If you have not read the university's policies and definitions of academic integrity, you should do so (see the course catalogue). In addition to those policies, the following policies will apply to this course.
Instances of academic dishonesty of any form will be treated seriously and harshly. Academic dishonesty includes, but is not limited to, plagiarism (representing someone else's ideas or words as your own), cheating on an exam, or copying homework assignments. Additionally, making false statements to make-up an assignment or exam, to obtain any kind of extension on course work, or to obtain any kind of special consideration of any policy will constitute cheating and will be treated as such under this policy. This policy should not, however, be construed as a prohibition of students working collaboratively on homework assignments. Although there is a fine line between collaboration and plagiarism, please keep in mind that assignments are turned in with a single name and should represent the work product of a single person's efforts. Discussing a general approach to a problem or checking answers is acceptable, but copying of work or otherwise presenting another person's work as one's own is a violation.
Any student who engages in academic dishonesty or allows it to occur will be subjected to one or more of the following consequences depending on the severity of the offense, at the sole discretion of the instructor: receiving a zero on the assignment in question; receiving the next lower letter grade than otherwise earned for the course; receiving a letter grade of "F" for the course; referral to the student judicial process (the consequences of which include disciplinary probation, suspension from coursework, or dismissal from the university).
Additionally, students have the responsibility to prevent others from copying their work for the course. Should evidence of such copying come to light, all parties involved in each incident will share the same consequences. Allowing someone to copy your work compromises the integrity of the evaluation and constitutes dishonest academic behavior.
Finally, all students are expected to conduct themselves in the classroom in a polite and respectful manner and in accordance with the student code of conduct. I expect all students to respect their colleagues by not behaving in any way that disrupts the classroom or makes it difficult for others to participate in class. Students who need to leave early are expected to sit close to the door and leave quietly. Likewise, students who arrive late are expected to sit in the most easily accessible seat and not climb over backpacks and books to sit in a particular seat.